Saturday, September 17, 2011

Fireworks at PERS hearing (Video included.).

Highlights:
-PERS Commission funded by federal stimulus dollars
-2010 audit states PERS is 64% funded
-PERS has $21 billion of assets
-PERS paid $409 million more in benefits than it received in contributions in 2010.
-Watch Tim Medley & Sam Valentine's testimony in Part 3 at 3:20
-Earlier post on PERS Investments

The PERS Commission held a hearing for public comments Wednesday afternoon. Governor Barbour appointed the commission to study the Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System citing a need to ensure the long-term stability of PERS. Controversy arose when the most recent audit of PERS revealed it was funded at a level of 64%.

Gulport Mayor George Schloegel chairs the commission and is the former President of Hancock Bank. The Mayor stated the commission was funded by federal funds provided to states to review their retirement systems. Just in case Cottonmouth did understand that statement, JJ asked Laura Hipp, spokeswoman for the Governor's office about the funding source. She replied in an email: The PERS Study Commission is using $250,000 of federal fiscal stabilization funds. These were part of the federal stimulus dollars given to the states to stabilize state finances."

Before we get started on what took place at the hearing, here are the basic facts about PERS according to its most recent audited financial statements and Executive Director Pat Robertson's comments at a May luncheon videotaped by this website. All figures are based on the financial statements for the year ending June 30, 2010. READ THIS BEFORE YOU READ ANYTHING ELSE.

Employees: 165,644
Average years of service is 31
Average age is 59.

Asset allocations:
47.8% in US equities
25.4% in debt securities
4.6% in real estate
19.5% in non-US equities

Total assets: $21.2 billion on May 1,2011, $17.1 billion in 2010 ($15.5 billion in 2009, $19.7 billion in 2008).

Investment rate of return: 14.1% for 2010.
3-year rolling average: (5.5%)
5-year rolling average: 2.1%
10-year rolling average: 2.3%
20-year rolling average: 7.4%
30-year rolling average: 8.7%

Investment performance since 2000:
2000: 8.4%
2001: -7.1%
2002: -6.6%
2003: 3.5%
2004: 14.6%
2005: 9.8%
2006: 10.7%
2007: 18.9%
2008: -8.2%
2009: -19.4%
2010: 14.1%

Current funding level of actuarial accrued liability: 64.2%. Ms. Robertson said 80% is considered to be the "benchmark of a well-funded plan." Ms. Robertson stated at the May 3 luncheon PERS' accrued liabilities have doubled since 1998 (thanks to the legislature's increase in benefits in 1999 with no additional improvement in "funding mechanisms"). 2010 audited financial statements

Page 8 of the 2010 audit states PERS spent $409 million more in benefits payments than it received in contributions although that does exclude the $2.1 million income from investments. PERS lost $3.7 million in investment income in 2009.

Mayor Schloegel said the mission was to audit the system and "make recommendations to the next administration" and legislature and the objective "is to ensure the retirement system is sound over the long haul." He introduced the commission members, made an opening statement, then moved on to public comments. The room was packed with over 100 people in attendance. Retirees and PERS members comprised most of the audience.

The comments had a common theme after awhile: The State of Mississippi should honor its commitments to its retired employees. The retirement system was a strong recruiting tool used by agencies. Retirees are on fixed incomes and are squeezed by inflation. Here are some comments made at the hearing:

*Brenda Scott
, President of the Mississippi Alliance of State Employees: "No one should be making scapegoats of public workers..... It is reckless to propose a change in the pension plan when it is more costly to administer and shift costs to employees." (23:00)

*Carolyn Smith: President of Retired Education Personnel of Mississippi. "We have a great retirement system..... We strongly believe the PERS Board should continue to be elected by the members of PERS and the Executive Director be appointed by the board. (28:00)

*Ann Thames: Former employee at Department of Mental Health. Advocated keeping the system as it is. She told the commission the retirees are taxpayers as well. She told Senator Kirby 1,163 employees worked in his district and Mr. Stone had 452 employees in Lauderdale County. (33:00)

* Dr. Phillip Burchfield :Superintendent of Clinton Public Schools. "It is our hope the current make-up (of the board) is not changed... Moving away from a defined benefit plan would have major ramifications. Perhaps as many as 50% would either not participate in the plan or when changing jobs would withdraw funds and spend them on frivolous expenditures.... If we switched to a defined contribution program, there is no way the fund could sustain itself." (42:15)

*Kevin Gilbert: MAE. Oh heck, just WATCH this clip at 49:31 and all of Part 2. Words can't begin to describe his thundering, and I do mean thundering, oration.

*Tim Medley. Investment Advisor. Made some great points. Served 18 months in 2007 as a non-voting member of the PERS board to fill an unexpired term. Made three observations. "The state retirement system is underfunded. I am aware the staff of PERS takes exception to this..... I do think we have a problem. Second observation is this
assumed rate of return of 8% is I'll say, ambitious..... The governing board needs to have more investment professionals. Of the ten members of the board of trustees, there are two that have investment backgrounds (and will reduce to one when Tate moves up). If you look at Washington State, which is 99% funded, they have ten voting members and five non-voting members. Those five all have extensive investment backgrounds. North Carolina has an investment advisory committee that meets four times a year. It has six members. Five of those members have an extensive investment background. We should increase the funding for the investment part. The state of Mississippi has one, just one chartered financial analyst to handle $20 billion. I know they use outside consultants but they have one. Washington State, they have alot more money. They have 75 investment consultants. PERS should have at least ten. ...." (3:20 of Part 3. Worth watching. About the only one who really talked numbers).

There are more comments in the videos posted below. Mayor Schloegel said no recommendations would be made until after the elections so the issue could not be turned into a political football. The commision retained the actuarial firm of Gabriel Roeder & Smith to act as a consultant. The firm serves as actuary for 29 statewide retirement and healthcare plans and is the largest consultant in its field nationwide.









Read this for some humor.


24 comments:

Anonymous said...

While I can see the fact the economy is in the dump and returns are expected to drop, I do not understand why the PERS management cannot adjust and throw up the signal, "Hey, we are drowning, and it doesn't look rosy, even IF the economy recovers." Can we get some help to solve this? Apparently, it took HB to finally tell them, "if you won't do it, I will."

PERS, currently, is a recipe for disaster. Bureaucrats who have been cozy in positions for years as the economy has allowed them to publish "Everything is OK" with oversight from other bureaucrats who say the same.

Wonder when they are going to say, in unison, "Hey we better raise taxes on the taxpayers to keep PERS solvent."

Notice previously, they floated the "We are going to increase employee contributions" and that went over like a brick balloon.

Anonymous said...

IMO the rolling IRR data Kingfish has posted is the key takeaway for discussion and damns the decision makers who have been stupidly clinging to the 8% assumed RR for at least a minimum of one decade too long.

For perspective here is a 50-year chart for the S&P 500.

It is also important to note when reviewing the yearly performance data that the ups and downs in growth are not straight calculations. In order words $1000 invested in PERS Jan 1 2009 lost (19.4%) of its value in 2009 AND was still down (9.2%) on Dec 31 2010 despite the overall performance bump of +14.6%.

If you are a CURRENT public employee contribution to PERS you are a fool if you don't DEMAND that it get fixed right here, right now. If you don't shout loud and clear for accountability then you have no one to blame but yourselves as you continue to throw money into this shit performing system.

Kingfish said...

Burchfield also gave away the dirty little secret. Government employees HAVE to participate in the program. State. County. City. They have no choice. Personally I have no problem with defined benefit programs as some do BUT if you are going to have them, then run them right and that means being up-front about everything.

Anonymous said...

If PERS was a selling point to prospective employees -- which is a vastly overstated piece of propaganda -- then it can only be presented that one gains more in retirement than one contributes during employment.

The PERS participants will never tell the truth.

Kingfish said...

Of all the teachers I know hired, I've yet to hear one mention PERS as a reason for employment.

One thing I noticed in all the comments made at the hearing, few of those opposing the commission mentioned any numbers. One lady cherry picked the returns. She picked the best 15 year period and went off of that. Brenda Scott focused on the $21 billion in assets. Not one..... not one, discussed the half a billion dollars more in payouts than contributions made in 2010. Mr. Valentine was long on accusations and short on actual facts as well.

Anonymous said...

What tools you commenters are if you actually think 'taxpayers' are coughing up heavy cash to prop up PERS. So, now it's a 'secret' that participation in the system is mandatory if you work in jobs covered by the system? What a revelation! In bad economic times, every program becomes a PONZI scheme, only difference is the employee can't opt out of the scheme. Get over it.

Kingfish said...

No one has said taxpayers are coughing up heavy cash to prop up PERS although lets be real honest here, the taxpayers pay for every dime put into PERS either through employee salaries or contributions appropriated by the legislature.

I've had more than one government employee contact me raising hell over the fact no one mentions how they are forced to join the system and how much they resent it so take it up with your fellow members.

The problem with you is when we mention PERS is only funded at a 64% level, there are few on the board with any investment expertise, and we are paying out $400 million more than we take in a year, you want us to ignore all that and just let the markets recover. Well you know what, Tate tried that argument with Cecil and Johnny at the MPACT hearings and they didn't think much of it. But because this time its the retirees and government employees in the line of fire and not evil Republicans, its a different story.

Anonymous said...

64% funded is almost unrecoverable. 80% isn't a benchmark for funding, it is a minimum. 100% funding should be the goal. It is going to take substantial contributions and/or investment earnings in excess of benefit payouts to overcome that kind of deficit.

The main problem I see is the unrealistic 8% rate of return. While the 30 year return does indeed exceed that, the 20 year does not and the 10 year is woefully short. One thing to keep in mind regarding the 30 year return is that you are starting at a historically low point in history (July 1, 1980). The economy had been stagnant through most of the 1970's, and even though returns for the decade averaged almost 6% annually, real rates of return sucked because inflation was out of control and averaged almost 10% annually. A stock investor would have actually lost 40% in real purchasing power over the 1970's. We were overdue for a positive correction.

I do think we will eventually get back into the 8% - 10% rates of return, but not for five or ten more years and even then it won't be forever. The cash flow issues are going to catch up to them, and by the time returns do improve they won't have the investable assets to make the income necessary to cover their benefit shortfalls.

The PERS commission has its work cut out for them. I don't envy their jobs one bit. The first thing they need to do is adjust their expected returns over time and assume no more than a 4% return over the next five years. The Fed has already pledged to keep their interest rate at around 0.25% for the next two years. A 3.75% return above that is still what I would consider agressive. If they don't have the funds necessary to invest it won't matter what the return rate is in 10 years.

One telling point in the actuarial report is that the unfunded liability increased from $10 Billion to $11.25 billion from 2009 to 2010. That is a 10.25% increase in one year despite having earned 14% on their assets. Their funded status dropped from 67% to 64% during that same time. That kind of negative change is unsustainable.

One final point to my rambling. While I didn't watch to all of the hearing video, I didn't hear any of the PERS supporters actually coming up with ideas where the benefit money is going to come from. They all wanted to keep the system the same, but the staus quo is burning through net assets like there is no tomorrow. How are the future retirees supposed to live when there is no money left to pay benefits? I don't care how many promises the politicians made, unless the money is there they will get nothing.

Full disclosure, I have a vested interst in PERS. I'm 42 with 8 years of service but no longer work with a public agency. My wife is 39 with 15 years of service and is a currently employed teacher. We would like to receive benefits at some point, but with at least 20 more years before we will be able to retire I am beginning to wonder if the benefits will be there at all.

Shadowfax said...

Kingfish; Please allow me to correct you on one point with your lambasting me as uninformed and having a meaningless opinion. Your claim that 'every dime' put into the system is contributed by Mississippi taxpayers.

That is simply not true. Many of these agency position, and at least one or two entire agencies, are federally funded and not in any way paid for by Mississippi taxpayers.

This time you popped off at the mouth without facts. Imagine that.

Kingfish said...

gee Shadow, who do you think pays for federal funds?

Taxpayers.

Seems like you're the one popping off with no facts.

Shadowfax said...

You've been caught with your britches down on this one. You know damned well you were implying that Mississippi taxpayers are on the hook for the system. And that's simply not true in the cases I just illustrated for you. Actually, at the risk of correcting you once again, citizen taxpayers don't fund the federally financed jobs either. Employers do, through FUTA taxes. Please open yourself up to facts that you haven't necessarily discovered on your own. Although rare, they sometimes do exist.

Anonymous said...

OK, I'm a public employee with a recommendation for change -- roll back the benefits increase that happened in the late 1990's. None of that needed to happen, it was a boondoggle for legislators and agency heads who were close to retirement.

The COLA at that time was 3% simple, not compounded, and people were fine with it. I would be interested in looking at the relative percentage of benefits paid out in COLAs prior to the changes in the 90's, and afterward.

You might have to exempt people who retired between the time of the increases and now -- it's one thing to make a change to a "promised" benefit, totally another thing to change an active benefit. The lawsuits that would produce would last for years.

Finally, I am TOTALLY fine with Board membership changing to include investment professionals, though I think they should remain non-voting. And something ought to be done about how we vote for our reps on the Board. Seems like the same old guys all the time, and I know that in many agencies, employees are INSTRUCTED who to vote for.

The only reason I pay attention to PERS is because my dad had trouble with his application a while back and I had to help him, and I learned more that I ever knew. I pay attention now. I don't know why no one does a better job educating public employees about PERS, the HR people usually just tell you the money has to come out of your check, pat you on the head, and send you on your way.

Anonymous said...

I'm sensing a theme here.

I think the new GOP theme now is " every man for himself". If you don't see the wisdom in retirement plans or health insurance as a young person, then it's your fault. Go beg on the street at 70 or die because you don't have a pension or investment fund and aren't covered for health insurance so you can't afford a life saving procedure. So what, too, if you have children who are sick and you didn't get covered. Let them die while you try to raise money in the community.

Society apparently should have no interest in keeping beggars and the dying off the streets. After all, it's part of the charm of Third World countries.

The richest Nation in the world should totally be about accumulating personal wealth and to hell with everything else. Besides, isn't THAT what being a Christian is all about...just helping the few we decide through our churches are deserving as our churches can't help everyone and are busy reaching out to those in the Third World as they are surely more ignorant? That Sermon on the Mount should be ignored in favor of the Old Testament wisdom. The " Christ" part of Christian doesn't mean we have to place more importance on His Word, or does it?!

Anonymous said...

9:14

I don't remember anything from Sunday School that said our Christian charity should be extended to taking care of the irresponsible or lazy.

However, God does take care of drunks and fools, so you should be covered.

Anonymous said...

I work my ass off. I can't afford health insurance. If I get moderately (not even seriously) ill, I will have to file bankruptcy. We are headed for the rich, the working poor, and the dirt poor. The middle class is the golden goose that both democrats and republicans seem content to eat, and supporting these people as a way of ingratiating yourself will not protect you.

Anonymous said...

I work my ass off too, but not for your benefit. If you can't afford health insurance examine your personal expenditures. I have a feeling that EVERYONE has some room to cut expenses to pay for something if it rises to the level of what they feel is important. Cell phones, tv service, X-box games and Domino's are not entitlements.

I would love to go get something for nothing, but I have this nagging medical condition called personal responsibility. And the sad thing is it's genetic, I'm afraid I'm passing it on to my kids, who I guess will wind up supporting yours.

Darryl said...

Bravo, 11:41, bravo.

Anonymous said...

11:26 and 11:41, get over yourselves. This is a real issue that impacts a lot of people for better and worse. And it deserves thoughtful discussion. Please take the "rich people are mean to me" and "poor people get what they deserve" crap to another board. I know they have room at the C-L.

Anonymous said...

Please tell me where in the 11:41 post you read "poor people get what they deserve"? It merely states that someone who has the ability to cut back and afford something should do it if it is important to them. This includes red&yellow, black&white, rich&poor, left&right. Spending your money is descretionary on your part. Spending mine is not.

That goes for someone living in a $30K home driving a $60K vehicle, or someone living in a $400K home driving a $10K vehicle. CHOICES

Shadowfax said...

How does any of the last ten posts apply to the PERS dilemma, if one exists?

Shadow said...

'Do'.........

Anonymous said...

SFax; I notice some of your posts have been left up. Congrats.

Kingfish said...

The reason why some of SF's posts are not appearing is because they have turned into a series of comments complaining about how I'm not being fair to SF, how I can't handle any criticism from SF, and just plain whining about the treatment of SF's comments. When SF makes a good comment, the comment goes up and we all know SF is capable of making good comments. No one would mistake him for Alvin Edney.

However, this all got started when SF started accusing me of posting under different screen names. Which was not true. Then SF accused me of not approving comments. Problem is said comments were never submitted. So SF is already on thin ice for making false accusations. As SF now repeatedly whines about being treated unfairly, I will say I don't have to put up with it and won't. SF makes good comments, the comments will be posted. SF used up his mulligans on stupid posts. Its my board and I make the rules. I allow more stuff on this site than do other sites in this state. however, I'm not going to let it turn into the CL forums either. That, my friends, is the bottom line.

roscoe said...

Does anyone but me think it's strange that PERS is included in the committee's review, but not the Highway Patrol's retirement system? PERS is a 25 year retirement (30 years as of next year!); MHP's retirement is 20 years. Has anyone considered the burden of the HP retirement on the system? The legislature for some reason won't touch this sacred cow.



Recent Comments

Search Jackson Jambalaya

Subscribe to JJ's Youtube channel

Archives

Trollfest '09

Trollfest '07 was such a success that Jackson Jambalaya will once again host Trollfest '09. Catch this great event which will leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Othor Cain and his band, The Black Power Structure headline the night while Sonjay Poontang returns for an encore performance. Former Frank Melton bodyguard Marcus Wright makes his premier appearance at Trollfest singing "I'm a Sweet Transvestite" from "The Rocky Horror Picture Show." Kamikaze will sing his new hit, “How I sold out to da Man.” Robbie Bell again performs: “Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be Bells” and “Any friend of Ed Peters is a friend of mine”. After the show, Ms. Bell will autograph copies of her mug shot photos. In a salute to “Dancing with the Stars”, Ms. Bell and Hinds County District Attorney Robert Smith will dance the Wango Tango.

Wrestling returns, except this time it will be a Battle Royal with Othor Cain, Ben Allen, Kim Wade, Haley Fisackerly, Alan Lange, and “Big Cat” Donna Ladd all in the ring at the same time. The Battle Royal will be in a steel cage, no time limit, no referee, and the losers must leave town. Marshand Crisler will be the honorary referee (as it gives him a title without actually having to do anything).


Meet KIM Waaaaaade at the Entergy Tent. For five pesos, Kim will sell you a chance to win a deed to a crack house on Ridgeway Street stuffed in the Howard Industries pinata. Don't worry if the pinata is beaten to shreds, as Mr. Wade has Jose, Emmanuel, and Carlos, all illegal immigrants, available as replacements for the it. Upon leaving the Entergy tent, fig leaves will be available in case Entergy literally takes everything you have as part of its Trollfest ticket price adjustment charge.

Donna Ladd of The Jackson Free Press will give several classes on learning how to write. Smearing, writing without factchecking, and reporting only one side of a story will be covered. A donation to pay their taxes will be accepted and she will be signing copies of their former federal tax liens. Ms. Ladd will give a dramatic reading of her two award-winning essays (They received The Jackson Free Press "Best Of" awards.) "Why everything is always about me" and "Why I cover murders better than anyone else in Jackson".

In the spirit of helping those who are less fortunate, Trollfest '09 adopts a cause for which a portion of the proceeds and donations will be donated: Keeping Frank Melton in his home. The “Keep Frank Melton From Being Homeless” booth will sell chances for five dollars to pin the tail on the jackass. John Reeves has graciously volunteered to be the jackass for this honorable excursion into saving Frank's ass. What's an ass between two friends after all? If Mr. Reeves is unable to um, perform, Speaker Billy McCoy has also volunteered as when the word “jackass” was mentioned he immediately ran as fast as he could to sign up.


In order to help clean up the legal profession, Adam Kilgore of the Mississippi Bar will be giving away free, round-trip plane tickets to the North Pole where they keep their bar complaint forms (which are NOT available online). If you don't want to go to the North Pole, you can enjoy Brant Brantley's (of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance) free guided tours of the quicksand field over by High Street where all complaints against judges disappear. If for some reason you are unable to control yourself, never fear; Judge Houston Patton will operate his jail where no lawyers are needed or allowed as you just sit there for minutes... hours.... months...years until he decides he is tired of you sitting in his jail. Do not think Judge Patton is a bad judge however as he plans to serve free Mad Dog 20/20 to all inmates.

Trollfest '09 is a pet-friendly event as well. Feel free to bring your dog with you and do not worry if your pet gets hungry, as employees of the Jackson Zoo will be on hand to provide some of their animals as food when it gets to be feeding time for your little loved one.

Relax at the Fox News Tent. Since there are only three blonde reporters in Jackson (being blonde is a requirement for working at Fox News), Megan and Kathryn from WAPT and Wendy from WLBT will be on loan to Fox. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both and a torn-up Obama yard sign will entitle you to free drinks served by Megan, Wendy, and Kathryn. Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required. Just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '09 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.


Note: Security provided by INS.

Trollfest '07

Jackson Jambalaya is the home of Trollfest '07. Catch this great event which promises to leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Sonjay Poontang and his band headline the night with a special steel cage, no time limit "loser must leave town" bout between Alan Lange and "Big Cat"Donna Ladd following afterwards. Kamikaze will perform his new song F*** Bush, he's still a _____. Did I mention there was no referee? Dr. Heddy Matthias and Lori Gregory will face off in the undercard dueling with dangling participles and other um, devices. Robbie Bell will perform Her two latest songs: My Best Friends are in the Media and Mama's, Don't Let Your Babies Grow up to be George Bell. Sid Salter of The Clarion-Ledger will host "Pin the Tail on the Trial Lawyer", sponsored by State Farm.

There will be a hugging booth where in exchange for your young son, Frank Melton will give you a loooong hug. Trollfest will have a dunking booth where Muhammed the terrorist will curse you to Allah as you try to hit a target that will drop him into a vat of pig grease. However, in the true spirit of Separate But Equal, Don Imus and someone from NE Jackson will also sit in the dunking booth for an equal amount of time. Tom Head will give a reading for two hours on why he can't figure out who the hell he is. Cliff Cargill will give lessons with his .80 caliber desert eagle, using Frank Melton photos as targets. Tackleberry will be on hand for an autograph session. KIM Waaaaaade will be passing out free titles and deeds to crackhouses formerly owned by The Wood Street Players.

If you get tired come relax at the Fox News Tent. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both will entitle you to free drinks.Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required, just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '07 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.

Note: Security provided by INS
.